I can already feel that the Tory leadership race is gonna give me an ulcer, because of the number of people on the centre and left who have neither read a history book nor the news saying things like “hopefully the Tory party will move to the right”.
Occasional reminder that a retiring senior civil servant of my acquaintance called Jenrick “the worst minister I have had directly to deal with in 45 years” prompting a scramble to work out who in the Heath government was worse.
When as our then-Secretary of State I referred to him as “The Curse of Jenrick”, a senior colleague responded “More like the First Segment of the Key to Time, except we can’t transform him into something useful by poking him with a stick”.
Which other ministers of the last mob had he directly worked with? Would be interesting to know if he’s worse than Grayling, Truss, Braverman etc. ad nauseum
I don’t (think) I know the official Jim is referring to, but comfortably worse than all of those. Two of those I think it’s a category error to confuse “bad” with “crap”.
Grayling was crap in that at transport he had no vision and at MoJ he was dreadful at holding his own in spending round negotiations, which is a big part of why the criminal justice system is in crisis now.
He was bad in that on top of being forced into cuts and the privatisation of the probation system (consequences of being crap), he did pointlessly draconian things like banning books from prisons.
I hopefully am not sounding snooty but can you explain the difference here? I have to admit I’m struggling - by crap do you mean terrible at the job and bad is morally bad? Sorry if I’m not getting the point …
Sunak was demonstrably crapper than either. Truss actually managed to implement cross-departmental policies in 49 days, something Sunak could not do in two years.
I mean Willie Whitelaw basically brought them down by facing off against the miners, so there’s an argument there (OTOH he’s just the kind of establishment buffer that civil servants liked in that era, tbf)
Yes, at least he has a political track record to merit it. Unlike other recent appointments. I may not support his politics, but can't doubt his commitment.
Farage is already spreading rumours that he would eat Tugendhat alive (which is not true, Tom's calm under ~actual~ fire let alone words from semi-fash ponce) which tells me which direction he fears.
How many years would it take to rebuild the party into a serious contender if any one of these people lead it in the first X?
Labour did it in one term, but they had a leader of a different calibre.