Post

Avatar
[email protected] shows how something very basic is done: A context ¶ describing the crimes that Trump was convicted of. Tons of reports on political response simply ignoring what the crime are -- real basic Who What When Where Why failure. www.huffpost.com/entry/after-...
Avatar
I’ve long since abandoned such omissions of key context as the result of “failure” These are *deliberate* editing decisions
Avatar
Well, shit, when someone describes the *central facts* of the situation that way, it's harder to bothsides or horse-race it. Seriously, an equivalent paragraph should be in every single damn article about the situation.