Faine Greenwood: I like to periodically re-assert how I approve of no war crimes whatsoever regardless of who does them, just so I can block all the shitlords who pop up to try to argue with me about it

I like to periodically re-assert how I approve of no war crimes whatsoever regardless of who does them, just so I can block all the shitlords who pop up to try to argue with me about it

“You condemn my side’s war crimes, guess you support my enemies’ war crimes then” no bitch dats a whole new sentence

“Oh you oppose [war crime]? You must support [war crime] / hate [group of people]!” - someone trying to guilt you into supporting war crimes when they do them

Yes, no one is under any ideological compulsion to support war crimes or terrorism no matter who perpetrates them. Neither are you required to condemn messy diplomacy which may mitigate those acts and possibly prevent a wider regional war. Sometimes there is no really good response available.

shit is complicated

And complicated shit is really complicated.

💯💯💯

Exactly. I didn’t create the world or it’s problems, I just live here and try to follow a consistent set of morals. Nothing more or less.

It’s weird because opposing moral atrocities … isn’t hard? Really?

I’ve been called a colonizer for opposing Hamas’ 10/7 attacks and a Jew-hater for expressing outrage at civilian casualties. So yeah, one might think, in a world where every debate isn’t a zero-sun game it shouldn’t be

it’s like some people have never heard of consistency

Sounds like you hate waffles.

mayonnaise is the true war crime

I sympathize, but there are far worse things.

So tired of how being a reasonable person means it's unfair to hold a nation state to a higher ethical standard than a terrorist organization.

Post