Absolutely, and let me tout my less-radical-than-it-seems suggestion of what to do about SCOTUS: sortition.
Only the role of the chief justice is constitutionally enshrined. Write a Judiciary Act prescribing that the other seats get filled by a yearly random draw from the courts of appeals.
i mentioned this before but the last week or two has fully clarified that the rest of our lives is a drag-out fight against the supreme court that starts with priming the public to enthusiastically support — or at the very least resist decorum-based media calls against — completely rebuilding it
Make it impossible, in other words, for axe-grinding litigants to know who would hear their union-busting/Black-voter suppressing case du jour — or for the Harlan Crows of the world to know where to send their bribes.
In its early days as an institution, the Supreme Court’s justices used to ride circuit – presiding over cases in assigned states or regions. Sortition would invert this practice — assigning Senate-confirmed judges to one-year stints serving on the nation’s federal court of final appeal.
Because the structure of the Supreme Court isn't defined in constitutional text — only the role of chief justice is — Congress can write language redefining its membership. As this article argues, it departs from legislative precedents to say that change can happen only once all seats fall vacant: