Kate Starbird

Profile banner

Kate Starbird

@katestarbird.bsky.social

Professor at University of Washington, HCDE. Cofounder and Director of the UW Center for an Informed Public. Researcher of online rumors and disinformation. Also, former basketball player (Stanford, ABL, WNBA).
Avatar
Whether Biden drops out or continues, I expect a primary target of foreign info operations this year to be the legitimacy of the Democratic candidate and the legimitacy of the courts in relation to the the GOP candidate. Expect them to target audiences on both sides and exploit organic criticism.
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
So hey, here's a thing I don't think a lot of folks know: That whole "Patient Zero" thing? The French-Canadian airhost who supposedly spread HIV all over America? That's not real. That's not what happened or how it happened.
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
I was prepared for disaster, but the Netchoice decision is good. It rejects the broadest arguments made by the states and the platforms. It recognizes that platforms are ‘editors’ but dismisses the argument that regulation in this sphere is categorically unconstitutional.
Knight Institute Comments on Supreme Court Ruling In Cases Involving Florida and Texas Social Media Lawsknightcolumbia.org
Avatar
There are a lot of foreboding signs about the state of the world. But I want to add two counter points. One, women’s basketball. Damn! Two, about 30 people (mostly straight friends and family members) asked my wife and me to save them a place along the parade route for Seattle Pride tomorrow.
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
I don’t love the headline - we absolutely can fight back for 2024! - but this is a good summary connecting the dots between Murthy v Missouri and the extended Congressional harassment campaign by the Weaponization committee targeting academics and election officials. www.axios.com/2024/06/28/s...
SCOTUS decision has come too late to help 2024 election disinformation researchers, experts warnwww.axios.com Foreign influence campaigns targeting the U.S. elections are expected to outnumber what's been seen in past elections.
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
“Unless our scientific institutions are willing to step up and denounce attacks on those who risk their lives to defend principles of science and public health…our society will begin to unravel. That unravelling is already far advanced in America.” www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
Offline: In defence of Dr Fauciwww.thelancet.com “Is this what we have become? Is this what we have devolved into?” US Congressman Kweisi Mfume was reacting to comments from Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene at a hearing of the Select Subcommitt...
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
Avatar
If you're curious about the SCOTUS decision in Murthy v Missouri — and you should be if you care about social media, moderation, disinformation, censorship (or "censorship") — then you should read this article. TL;DR: The foundations of the case were bullshit. www.techdirt.com/2024/06/26/s...
Supreme Court Sees Through The Nonsense, Rejects Lower Courts’ Rulings Regarding Social Media Moderationwww.techdirt.com Actual free speech survives for yet another day as the Supreme Court has rejected a bunch of fantasy-land nonsense in a case in which Trumpists were absolutely positive they’d caught the government…
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
Today's ruling in Murthy v. Missouri is good news for independent researchers and the American public. The case was thrown out on standing grounds, with the court acknowledging the facts presented were "murky" at best and at other times "clearly erroneous."
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
Murthy out. No standing! Great outcome. Opinion by Barrett who calls out the 5th Circuit for affirming the DC's "sweeping" preliminary injunction and says it was "wrong to do so" SO REFRESHING TO READ
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
6 months ago, I dragged my ass 8 wks post-partum to NYC to debate one of this cases's plaintiffs & so-called "censorship victim" in what I thought would be a good faith debate only to get dogpiled by crazy right-wing conspiracy theorists when I insisted THERE WAS NO STANDING So:
Murthy out. No standing! Great outcome. Opinion by Barrett who calls out the 5th Circuit for affirming the DC's "sweeping" preliminary injunction and says it was "wrong to do so" SO REFRESHING TO READ
Avatar
Murthy v. Missouri decision: SCOTUS rejects arguments that government illegally "censored" protected speech, ruling that plaintiffs lack standing. Very good day for social media moderation and for researchers caught in the crosshairs of a ludicrous accusation. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
www.supremecourt.gov
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
Avatar
Question for wiser folks than me: is the similarity between celebrity “stars” and ancient god “stars” intentional? Or was the term “star” given to celebrities due to “everyone is watching them” and a bit of the “shooting star” dynamic?
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
Avatar
Sometimes I sit in front of the Zoom room window, waiting on the host to join for a few minutes, and then realize that I'm the host.
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
📌 New post from our team at CIP! A resurfacing election rumor about non-citizen voting is using a highly contested, peer-reviewed research to endorse distrust in the election process. It is important to consider the potential impact of bad science on the credibility of rumoring.
New "rapid" analysis from our CIP Election Research (ER) team: www.cip.uw.edu/2024/06/20/r... We explain how a flawed research paper has repeatedly catalyzed a misleading rumor about non-citizen voting. This rumor resurfaced in 2024 on a website dedicated to "facts" & spread widely on social media.
The anatomy of a resurging rumor stemming from peer-reviewed research that non-citizens vote in U.S. electionswww.cip.uw.edu Using peer-reviewed research in misleading ways will likely re-emerge in the 2024 election or future election cycles.
Avatar
New "rapid" analysis from our CIP Election Research (ER) team: www.cip.uw.edu/2024/06/20/r... We explain how a flawed research paper has repeatedly catalyzed a misleading rumor about non-citizen voting. This rumor resurfaced in 2024 on a website dedicated to "facts" & spread widely on social media.
The anatomy of a resurging rumor stemming from peer-reviewed research that non-citizens vote in U.S. electionswww.cip.uw.edu Using peer-reviewed research in misleading ways will likely re-emerge in the 2024 election or future election cycles.
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
Here is a free-to-use infographic that explains how several actors, motives, incentives, and communities coordinate around a larger anti-science narrative; This is leading to the harassment, abuse, intimidation, and political prosecution of innocent scientists.
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
Check on your people. Heat waves aren’t generally regarded as the most deadly of natural disasters but they often are.
An exceptional heat wave is about to build into the Midwest, the Northeast and the Mid-Atlantic, with widespread record high temperatures occurring over multiple days. Here's what you need to know.
Eastern U.S. braces for extreme, long-lasting heat wave: How hot it will getwww.washingtonpost.com The Ohio Valley, Northeast and Mid-Atlantic will be particularly hard hit. Heat indexes over 100 will stretch from the Gulf Coast to Canada.
Avatar
Walking across Red Square (UW campus) and a seagull just dive bombed me & stole the sandwich out of my hand (still wrapped). He dropped it and then we had a whole altercation. I menaced him w/ a bottle of Pellegrino, while laughing hysterically. People must think I'm insane. I'm eating my sandwich.
Avatar
I’ve been coding for 40 years and I still lost ~30 minutes over the weekend to a pair of missing ().
Avatar
Everything is “censorship”. They demand not only that they can say whatever they want, but that platforms have to promote it, other users have to act as vectors for it to reach their audiences, and that they cannot even be called out spreading for hate and BS… otherwise it’s “censorship.”
Trolling + misinformation requires an audience: so when rather than responding, I simply block, they also perceive that as censorship. This latest accusation, for example, claims that, as a university professor, I am a public official and hence shouldn’t be allowed to block anyone on social media.
Reposted byAvatar Kate Starbird
Avatar
An essential read from the former research manager of Stanford’s Internet Observatory, on how spreaders of misinformation (people who have been deceived) and disinformation (people who know they’re lying) view even *labelling* a post as misinformation as censorship. More … 🧵
Avatar
Truly fantastic article from Renee DiResta describing how she became a central villain in the fantasies of the "bullshit industrial complex" (they wouldn't let her use that title) and explaining the ties to Jan 6, other attacks on researchers, and more. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archiv...
My Encounter With the Fantasy-Industrial Complexwww.theatlantic.com Online conspiracy theorists turned me into “CIA Renee.”