"...this opinion depends on an implicit belief that the only person who would act so brazenly is Trump, and that because the majority of the justices on the Court support Trump and want him to be president, he must be shielded from prosecution."
The Supreme Court’s ruling putting presidents above the law must be understood not simply as a grant of immunity for past crimes, but an enthusiastic endorsement of those he will commit if given the chance. www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
The presumption of all modern jurisprudence is that the courts will remain captured by conservatives, so they are not worried about handing tools to Democrats, because they will constrain them and enable Trump through selective interpretation. It’s anti-judicial, against equal justice.
