Scott Lemieux

Profile banner

Scott Lemieux

@lemieuxlgm.bsky.social

What used to be is gone and what ought to be ought not to be so hard. Tweets speak for myself only.
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
Administrative agencies: very dangerous, must be line edited by Matthew Kaczmaryk President: operates behind a curtain, no peeking
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
if your instinct is "calm down, surely this is an exaggeration," allow me to assure you that it's really not
"Don't worry, if the president imprisons his political enemies, you can still get a writ of habeas corpus." "But to prove that's why you've been imprisoned requires proof of..." "Presidential motive!" "And under Trump v US, presidential motive is..." "Inadmissible!"
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
intimidating and punishing journalists who expose flagrant state corruption, another classic Jim Crow mechanism
She won a Pulitzer for exposing how the country's poorest state spent federal welfare money. Now she might go to jail. "The rabbit's got the gun now," said a lawyer for former Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant, who is trying to force reporter Anna Wolfe to reveal her sources.
She exposed how the nation's poorest state spent federal welfare money. Now she might go to jail.www.nbcnews.com "The rabbit's got the gun now," said a lawyer for former Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant, who is trying to force reporter Anna Wolfe to reveal her sources.
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
Honestly still in shock that the most crooked American President in history said "I need immunity" and the GOP Supreme Court said "well, it's nowhere in the constitution, but sure, why not? Whats the worst that could happen?"
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
Can we maybe get this bullshit updated?
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
The Framers: *literally wrote many, many passages that you would swear on your life were prophetic visions of Donald J. Trump, and how such a figure must be guarded against at all costs* John Roberts: surely what they wanted is for this uniquely lawless figure to be placed above the law
"...this opinion depends on an implicit belief that the only person who would act so brazenly is Trump, and that because the majority of the justices on the Court support Trump and want him to be president, he must be shielded from prosecution."
Avatar
"...this opinion depends on an implicit belief that the only person who would act so brazenly is Trump, and that because the majority of the justices on the Court support Trump and want him to be president, he must be shielded from prosecution."
The Supreme Court’s ruling putting presidents above the law must be understood not simply as a grant of immunity for past crimes, but an enthusiastic endorsement of those he will commit if given the chance. www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
The Supreme Court Gives Its Blessing to Trump’s Criminalitywww.theatlantic.com And gives him permission for a despotic second term.
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
Oh look a country where people strategically try to prevent the anti-democratic party from taking power
THE sentence of the day: A Macronist incumbent in the Marseille region came in 3rd in her seat. She just dropped out to support the left. She said, about why she's maneuvering to block the far-right: "Defeats happen, but you can never recover from dishonor."
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
john roberts currently neck and neck with roger taney for worst chief justice in american history
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
i don't want to read a thing about Ralph Nader unless it concludes with "he was survived by his cats."
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
/8 At any rate, congratulations to the Federalist Society for an achievement beyond the reach of the British, outside the grasp of bloody civil war, impossible to Nazis and Soviets and terrorists: defeating the American idea.
Avatar
Good thread. (And worth noting again that the holding that official acts cannot even be used as evidence is so extremist and pernicious ACB wouldn't join that part of the Court's opinion)
There are two elements to the immunity decision that are particularly extreme in a way that many will miss: (1) motive is irrelevant and (2) immune acts are not just excluded from prosecution, they’re excluded from evidence. /1
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
Yes, maybe there's some clever version of hardball Biden's team can come up with, something that doesn't involve ordering assassinations. But one thing he *should* be able to say is "I reject the idea that the president is above the law, and I vow never to use this illegitimate 'immunity' defense."
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
My new one @Slate: "Trump Immunity Ruling Will Be John Roberts’ Legacy to American Democracy" Is the Supreme Court obtuse or disingenuous? slate.com/news-and-pol...
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
It's not an 'extreme hypothetical' if the guy promises to do it in literally every stump speech he gives.
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
He accuses the dissent of "extreme hypotheticals," then, instead of recognizing Trump as uniquely corrupt and criminal, speculates that the charges against him portend a future in which presidents "cannibalize" one another with criminal charges -- despite two centuries of that not happening.
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
It's not the worst of it, but what I may be actually angriest about (right now) is Roberts' smarmy smugness and dismissiveness in the final two paragraphs of section IV and the whole of section V. "Fear mongering," "extreme hypotheticals," "our perspective must be more farsighted," and this.
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Scott Lemieux
Avatar
Everyone has noticed how radical Mike Lee has become in recent years, but not enough have noticed how dumb he is.
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Rishi Sunak to the courtesy phone please
these numbers are basically vindication of one of my points in the NYT conversation, which is that whoever is the nominee inherits Biden’s position for the simple reason that they will be standard-bearers for the Biden administration.