Post

Avatar
tom nichols—of all people???—just made a good point: you have to talk about P2025 in simple real people terms. not policy wonk terms.
if you’re talking about project 2025 on tv you need to spell out what it means beyond an authoritarian blueprint!!
Avatar
Avatar
i’ve seen this floating around. has it been fact-checked?
Avatar
“beleifs” is killing me rn
Avatar
Avatar
This suggests to me the answer is "kind of." It's kind of been fact checked.
Avatar
https://bsky.app/profile/missingthept.bsky.social/post/3kwp7pvcn2u2y
DID YOU KNOW? People commonly assume that the number in Project 2025 refers to the year when in fact it’s the number of laws that Trump intends to violate.
Avatar
I really want a nicer version of this, with the references included as part of the original image, the rest of them items referenced as well, and the spelling error fixed while we're at it. (Not because i don't believe it all, but because the people who need to be convinced might not.)
Avatar
I read thru the Dept of Interiors section (as much as I could without vomiting), and this is correct on that bit, as far as i could tell. It's heinous. I did a mini-thread at the time. IANAL, but I am committed to Native matters, which it utterly guts.
Avatar
Avatar
yeah, there’s a version with citations to the specific page numbers for like 80% of the claims that I saw a few days ago, but only saw that version once
Avatar
Avatar
There's another version going around with page citations, but of course *that* hasn't been fact-checked
Avatar