embracing royalism for an American audience is the politics equivalent of Flat Eartherism - a contention that is so obviously bad that it's purpose isn't to convince but to demonstrate's someone's commitment to rejecting reality and willingness to adopt a false belief.
Far-right chud in NYT: "They went about the ordinary business of life - laboring, raising children, worshipping their creator - untroubled by futile expectations of change."
Medieval commoners: "I would rather the king and all kings were dead than that my son should be hurt on his little finger."
Merry England hobbitworld dumbass shit about how wonderful medieval yeoman peasant life was has obvious heirarchy-reinforcing purpose for booze-addled Euro reactionaries, but in America even the arch traditionalists agree our country is founded on rejection of kings.
I do think there's a particular type of servile personality that probably devolved as an evolutionary response that instinctually looks for opportunity to signal willingness to collaborate with aggression and cruelty and criminality as a survival instinct and you gotta understand royalists like that
