Comfortably Numb: Yeah, but in name only. It's just a regular music streaming service nobody heard about.

My fortune cookie had an ad for napster in it. This is hands down the worst time to be alive

Napster still exists?

Yeah, but in name only. It's just a regular music streaming service nobody heard about.

Good thing they got on that future cookie campaign to turn things around lol

*fortune cookie

I like Future Cookie even better

Better: WinAmp still exists, and with a new version!

WinAmp does exist though 🙂 webamp.org

Webamp • Winamp in your browserwebamp.org Winamp 2.9 reimplemented in HTML5 and JavaScript

Using Foobar2000 because i don't care about visualizations, but i need the best sound possible for my hobby.

It really whips the llamas ass...

IIRC; The newest version (5.16+) has spyware in it. Need confirmation on that. So “buyer beware.”

Darn it. At least the *old* version runs. Wait, the newest version is 5.9 I think, and isn't it going open-source? That should help with identifying potential Spyware situations a bit If only we could @ the #Winamp crew here, they'd know for certain

Just use the Web version 🤷‍♂️

no need. The 5.x version from (*cough a long time ago cough*) is perfectly fine for now Filing away that link for future reference, though

Promises from any corporate representative are only as good as the lawyers who “shall” validate the binding press release statement. Until then, I’ll believe it’s open-source when I see it validated & accepted by an open source peer reviewer or group.

Seems a reasonable ask. Especially since it won't be true open-source based on this. But some visibility is still good, yes?

Winamp is not going open source. Here's what it is doing - and whywww.zdnet.com To refresh its once iconic Windows media player, Winamp is kind of, sort of opening up the source code. See what that means for users and developers.

Post