I dunno, all plans to replace a successful incumbent President AFTER he won the primary because of a media-fueled panic over a single bad debate performance seem equally dumb to me, tbh.
He polls behind any potential replacement though. People were and are concerned with his age and faculties, and literally no one else would have that vulnerability. A lot of people have been saying it for four years, the dam just broke after the debate.
The theoretical polls better than the actual? I don't believe you. Next thing you're gonna try and tell me is that the dimmer fans of a 3-9 football team think starting the backup QB will fix it.
They’d just have a dozen new vulnerabilities, less buy-in from voters, no access to the campaign apparatus or war chest, and no time to address any of these vulnerabilities
