Post

Avatar
there is nothing I could possibly care about less than a powerful dissent. oh good job you wrote an essay, I'm sure that will help
Avatar
As I understand it, the most useful aspect of a well-written dissent is that it can provide ammo for overturning bad decisions in the future. So in that sense, I support them. In the moment, eh.
Avatar
"providing ammo" supposes that any of these decisions have to be based on coherent legal reasoning, which the current term proves is not true.
Avatar
The trouble is the liberals usually at least pretend to be trying to do that, so I think it's helpful in that sense. Obviously they shouldn't because they're playing by rules the cons aren't holding themselves to and yet.
Avatar
Fascism defeated with facts and logic delivered with eloquence.
Avatar
“Great dissent” means the right side lost, and lost big. I hate those words.
Avatar
the couple times dissents have been immediately pragmatic it's been the times they've made a call to action to congress to do their duty and fix the obvious mistake the court is making through legislation
Avatar
and the amount of times congress actually did fix it was like ?????????
Avatar
Avatar
i think it happened once. can't remember. anyway, pack the court after [redacted]
Avatar
I have to admit I would probably respect the liberals if they called for Joe Biden to order the assassination of their colleagues
Avatar
Unless they are dissenting loudly, frequently, & in public, I say they are all just as corrupt. Flush the whole court and start over. Fruit of a rotten tree.
Avatar
Hey now! Blogging has changed the world before.
Avatar
Sure, but there's a case to be made that the reason we are where we are today is due to the dissents written by Thomas and, before him, Scalia. Justices have to strategize with the tools they have.
Avatar
No, that's assuming that the rulings are based on law. They don't "have" to do anything. They decide what they want and then write a ruling provide retroactive justification.
Avatar
I mean, they need cases and they need at least 5. The dissents set up the cases part. The entire conservative wing is sending signals to ADF to tee up the cases the wing wants.
Avatar
I know this court no longer cares about standing or stare. But such courts have been beat back before, otherwise my family couldn't have come here and I couldn't be married. There's a lot that could be done politically. But I'm also all for dissents that articulate an affirmative vision of justice
Avatar
You seem to have lawyer-brain about this. Practically, the only reason you think dissents set up a vision of justice is because you believe—without evidence—that laws must and will be followed. The right wing of this country is saying loudly and repeatedly that they don’t agree with us about that.
Avatar
it's called "knowing what the fuck they're talking about" brain and you should try it
Avatar
I am not a lawyer. But the notion that articulating an *alternative vision of justice* is useless is not something I can get behind. I'm a child of immigrants in an interracial marriage. Dissents laid the groundwork for my life being possible! They weren't enough! But they were necessary!
Avatar
where do you think this 5 rule comes from. do you think it’s a good rule that will be respected in the future.