Something I think about a lot lately is how much Nazi support there actually was in the US and if things had gone slightly differently we would not have been calling ourselves the good guys of WWII
This is beyond the normalization of publications like the Times at the time. But the Times specifically was wrong on Hitler, wrong on MLK Jr, wrong on Ida B Wells, wrong on the famine in ukraine, wrong on weapons of mass destruction. Being wrong somehow isn't disqualifying.
Circling back I do wonder what would happen if we taught WWII history not as the US "boldly daring to do the right thing" but really ending up doing the right thing by the edge of a coin toss, and even then it wasn't like the country saw Jewish people as fully human.
Lincoln thought slavery was morally wrong but did not see himself as an abolitionist and did not think Black people deserved the same rights as white people. It is ok to be honest with his views.
The abolitionists were the radical firebrands of the day; he wasn't one of them, but he became the president of the anti slavery Republicans.
His views on black civil rights seem to have become more liberal over time or perhaps he just felt safer expressing them.
Lincoln and FDR are good examples of how you're never going to get a president who's in line with leftist values but you can muscle them into doing good anyway