Easy to lose sight of the significance here, but the sitting president just gave a speech condemning the Supreme Court for a ruling that expands presidential power. It’s also a president who stands to benefit from this ruling, given that his opponent is vowing to imprison him and his family.
He did the most Democratic thing ever, which was to agree with a meaningless dissent and then tell us that as President he didn't have the power or legitimacy to do anything about it and that it was up to us.
Just think: if we kept voting, we could elect a whole string of Democratic Presidents all of whom would tell us that they can't do anything and that it was up to us to elect another Democratic President who would also not be able to do anything.
America will saved if we can vote Democratic forever with no turnover -- people criticize the US two-party system but they usually don't think that there have to be fewer parties for the system to work
Democracy does not have a final win condition. Life and civilization are an ongoing process and pretending otherwise, that there's an ultimate destination, is the fascist fantasy. We don't need one-party rule, but we must win elections against the authoritarians forever, that's the "ever vigilant"
So what you’re saying is that you are willing to bargain with, and concede political ground to, fascists and right-wingers forever in the name of your Enlightened Liberal Values About Democracy.
I’d rather not, thanks.
idk about you but I spend most of my free time organizing alternate forms of political power via unions (labor, tenants, homeless, tribal etc) which *categorically exclude* Democrats, Republicans, and all of their moneyed donors. It is slow and unglamorous, but necessary to break the wheel.
We need to win enough elections to give us the power to expand the court, enshrine Roe in law, and write ethics/anti-corruption laws with actual teeth. To say “gratuities” are the same as bribes, etc.
Clinton received the 3rd most votes of any candidate to that point. She helped create Trump and didn't campaign in key states. Furthermore, Obama let McConnell ride roughshod over him and RBG refused to retire out of hubris. Obama promised to codify Roe, and had the numbers to do so.
I was only able to retire early because of the ACA
I am looking forward to the $2K annual out of pocket limit on Medicare drugs starting next January
Medicare btw was LBJ
I remember him
He did mess up on a Supreme Court appointment
Fortas, who resigned
That has had bad effects for 55 years
I was on a basic silver plan
Deductible was $2K per year for everything
So there's no way I would have had to pay $5K/month or even $5K/year
Maximum out of pocket was 8K for the bronze plans iirc
I don't know what exact plan you're talking about
ACA does have annual out of pocket maximums afaik
Mine was about $2000/year
That's on top of premium
Which was 250 or 300/month
No idea where 5K/month on ACA happens
Obama and Democrats did set annual out of pocket maximums for ACA plans
And Biden and Democrats set annual out of pocket caps on drugs
2K per year starting next January
www.healthcare.gov/glossary/out....
He had a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate for 3 months out of his entire presidency. Then the Senate flipped because voters did not back him up and he missed his chance.