Post

Avatar
for fuck’s sake, man, what the fuck are they doing over there
Avatar
like, why would you publish this on the fourth of fucking july, and why wouldn’t you do even a single cursory search to see if he actually had voted recently
Avatar
I know this is a rhetorical question but the answer is because they legitimately want donald trump to be the next president and usher in a one-party autocracy for the rest of their lives because they think covering it will be fun for them
Avatar
That and trump will most definitely do political genocide and send dissenters and journalists to a painful death or labor camp before painful death, so they sense it and are going to instead start championing the guy with the gun pointed at their head. They are cowards plain and simple
Avatar
More profitable than fun, but yes.
Avatar
having money is fun, going to happy hours with your GOP operative buddies and feeling like you're in the room where it happens is fun, feeling like one of the main characters of history is fun
Why would a second term of Trump be profitable? There’s no more shock value!
Avatar
clarence thomas has had a very rich and fulfilling lifestyle because his actual benefactors have rewarded him for writing the things that they want him to, now extrapolate this to other people who write for a living
Yes, but he’s a conservative judge. What do the neurotic libs think they’d gain from a second Trump term? More book sales?
Avatar
prestige media people aren't libs, that's my whole point
They yearn for Mitt Romney, don’t they.
Avatar
Biden is very competent, boring, and absolutely terrible for selling subscriptions and driving page viees.
Avatar
I don't think it's that deep. NYT is known for having a somewhat educated reader base so readers should be intelligent enough to not let a simple news article change their decision to vote
Avatar
people intuitively understand that advertising exists as a multi-billion dollar industry because repeated and broad exposure to ideas influences people's behavior, but when it comes to the media suddenly it's "this doesn't count as bad because it doesn't change anyone's behavior entirely on its own"
Avatar
Differentiating views should be censored just because *some* people are too ignorant? Should we lower the bar on all literature too just because we're scared the ppl who can't think for themselves might act it out? Sounds like a dystopian way of gatekeeping information and shadow-banning free speech
Avatar
it's not "censorship" to say that newspapers should exercise socially responsible editorial judgment in their coverage by the standard you've set here, articles about how donald trump would be bad are being censored by the media because they aren't getting published but you're not mad about that