You already use this technology or similar technology if you use ediscovery tools. Certainly if you're going with "AI" in general and you use ediscovery tools.
The ediscovery tools that you use already incorporate NLP. If you're using a relatively up to date ediscovery tool, you're already enjoying the benefits of this technology, especially if the ediscovery process involves material in multiple languages.
Culling through a defined universe is entirely different than letting the AI loose. And at this point and for the near foreseeable, it is, let loose, not reliable. And if it is not reliable, it is near to useless.
I certainly didn't describe any situation where the AI was let loose. In fact I specifically said that after any such tools were used to identify pertinent information that it would have to be verified by a professional translator and undergo further scrutiny.
Except... I admitted I was not a lawyer and not an expert, and rather than working to communicate they kept latching onto errors related to law, while they confidently made statements about the nature and functionality of ML technologies like LLMs and NMTs.
Also, picking things apart is the essence of lawyering. Which is why some are quite well-versed enough to dismantle actual AI experts and creators on cross-examination.
