Post

Avatar
I know that I'm an outlier on this, but I think judges should be required to recuse themselves if they know any of the attorneys representing any of the parties more than casually. If you've ever had dinner together, you shouldn't be allowed to decide their case.
just throwing things out there, but there really should be a moratorium on judges handling cases litigated by their former firm/employer for some reasonable period. two years? three years? i would rather not haver to consider whether i want to take a case litigated by the judge's former colleagues.
Avatar
Avatar
A lot of people see no problem with SCOTUS Justices' former clerks arguing cases in front of them and I just... do see a problem with that!
Avatar
Again, let’s all agree the nine people for life structure has outlived its usefulness and create a very large panel, maybe all the appellate judges, and have them sit in term limited panels so that no one knows who is going to be hearing their case
Avatar
Although I know exactly what you’re saying, having lived in places where it is inevitable that all the lawyers and all the judges have all known each other forever, then you have to at least recognize the issue & try to mitigate the biases
Avatar
Basically the scotus bar has for generations been former Clerk’s litigating in front of former Clerk’s of prior justices right? Very democracy much nonnepotism
Avatar