Zach Rabiroff: Nothing says “party founded for and committed to the cause of the working class” like a pedantic insistence on proper nomenclature for make-believe knights.

Nothing says “party founded for and committed to the cause of the working class” like a pedantic insistence on proper nomenclature for make-believe knights.

I think Sir is just a bad translation of the Spanish “Sr” So is just PM señor Starmer

Prime Minister Sir Starmer it is

Speaking as a Brit, we don't give a damn about that kind of thing. He'll just be referred to by his name 99% of the time.

Oh, I'm sure. The American insistence on "Mr. President" even after the malevolent parasites have left office is multitudes more obnoxious, anyway.

(Former presidents Carter, Clinton, Bush, & Obama -Mango Mussolini is the only turd who insists on the incorrect honorific)

Traditionally, no, we don’t actually do that. Formally it’s now Mr. Bush, Mr. Carter, Mr. Obama as an address, or ‘Former President Clinton’ as a description. Extending the full title as a courtesy has been used informally, but it’s widespread use is new and kind of contentious.

British people gonna British.

His Starmerity

I mean no disrespect when I refer to every British guy over 30 as “that Mr. Bean motherfucker”

How can they want to be called Knights when they don't joust, fight to the death or have at least three parasitic infections? Ok, well, one of three shouldn't be enough.

Post