bakoon: at this point even seeing this font pisses me off. the sulzberger kid is doing some corky romano shit over there

at this point even seeing this font pisses me off. the sulzberger kid is doing some corky romano shit over there

The main answer to that question is, surprisingly, because it does

pamela paul really might be one of the worst motherfuckers alive, she writes shit specifically to get cited in conservative lawsuits to ban gender affirming care

a fuckin demon and not the cool kind

The Spawn kind of Clown.

It would be weird if she were, say, a book reviewer, but surely her decades of experience as a medical doctor qualify her to expound authoritatively on gender-affirming care.

also if you marry Bret Stephens you should not be allowed to write about families

She's stealing Jessie Singal's bit, for that matter

evergreen essay www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/columnists...

Columnists and Their Lives of Quiet Desperationwww.hamiltonnolan.com On Pamela Paul, and similar.

Couldn't have come up with a better term for this type of person than "uninspiring people"

insult to Corky Romano who was a good boy

This was my exact thought, heh. Corky doesn't deserve this comparison.

i admit i only saw the trailer to that film

You don't need to watch it, it wasn't great or anything, but Corky's heart is always in the right place as he screws up, which is more than can be said for Sulzberger.

the way I deep sigh every time I see it on my timeline even before reading the words

It’s called “Cheltenham” and yes I would like to never see it again please

Whenever I see that font I want to shoot whoever is involved with it. Literal lying and evil bullshit. And they get to be flaunted around as a respectable source. What a joke.

“Eyeroll Font”

The Onion is a more legitimate news outlet than the fucking New York Times.

The New York Terfs

Corky Romano shit would be good. Corky is the son in the crime family who isn’t a criminal. And, the movie tanked. I would accept either one of those at The Times.

Post