Daphne Keller

Profile banner

Daphne Keller

@daphnek.bsky.social

Finally got to a social network soon enough not to use my middle initial.
Avatar
Anyone else pause to quickly review Feist when they got to this part of Alito's NetChoice "concurrence"? @chup.blakereid.org?
Avatar
My least favorite part of Murthy is this. If govt pressure caused platforms to change their speech rules, and thus suppress plaintiffs' speech... then plaintiffs still have no standing. Because the pressure, having succeeded, is over now and no longer redressable. @davidgreene.bsky.social thoughts?
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Uh... the DC Circuit says that the Copyright Office's triennial rulemaking about exceptions to the DMCA's anti-circumvention rules is subject to the APA. Anyone know what that means in practice? www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opi...
www.cadc.uscourts.gov
Avatar
No big platform rulings today. Stand down, everyone.
Avatar
Hello Mastodon! I’m @[email protected] and this is my test post. I really, really hope these streams can merge. LMK if you’re over there and now available here on Bluesky by similar means!
Reposted byAvatar Daphne Keller
Avatar
Avatar
Will tomorrow be Murthy day?? You might want to brush up on Vullo with this thread from @davidgreene.bsky.social (or my thread from Monday) just in case!
Some thoughts on the NRA v Vullo decision and what it might presage for Murthy v Missouri: www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p... Thread follows, but the TLDR is the Court approves of the jawboning test applied by the 5th Circuit in Murthy (then Missouri v Biden). But the facts ... oh the facts ...
www.supremecourt.gov
Reposted byAvatar Daphne Keller
Avatar
Avatar
Last week the S Ct handed down a ruling that matters for jawboning cases about govt pressure on platform content moderation (including the Ct’s pending Murthy case). It got lost in the hubbub of other judicial developments, so I’m writing about it now. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p... 1/
www.supremecourt.gov
Avatar
Indulging in some fantasies about a future in which Musk is still running X/Twitter, and Frank McCourt is running TikTok.
Avatar
Weird day to have jury duty. It might be my imagination but I think everyone is more attentive to the “juries are the heart of democracy and justice” spiel in the intro video than we all were the last time I did this.
Reposted byAvatar Daphne Keller
Avatar
Everyone with a law degree is whispering this to themselves and rocking back and forth
He can’t pardon himself for state law crimes.
Reposted byAvatar Daphne Keller
Avatar
I salute E. Jean Carroll and Stormy Daniels for being braver than all three branches of our government.
Avatar
In Vullo, did the 1st Am-violating state action include negotiating/entering into the consent decrees? I know everyone is distracted rn so tagging @chup.blakereid.org @davidgreene.bsky.social -- no pressure, can't remember who I already asked elsewhere and who is on here!
Avatar
Wow. NRA v. Vullo is out. the NRA (represented by the @ACLU) wins on its 1st Am claims re jawboning by state official seeking to retaliate for the NRA's expressive activity by urging insurers not to cover the NRA. J. Sotomoyor writes for a unanimous Ct. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
www.supremecourt.gov
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
You know how every couple of years Congress fails to do its most basic job, and then the federal government shuts down (or nearly shuts down) for lack of budget? The latest Section 230 proposal is to do that, but for the Internet. publicknowledge.org/frustrated-w...
Anyone who thinks they can make things better by simply deleting Section 230 is definitely not paying attention. But if a Member of Congress truly wants to cut off their nose to spite their face, supporting the "sunsetting" proposal is a good way to do that, I guess. 1/
Frustrated With Its Own Failure, Congress Issues an Ultimatum to Big Techpublicknowledge.org A new bill that proposes to "sunset" Section 230 could work against Congress' very own goals of reining in Big Tech.
Avatar
Anyone who thinks they can make things better by simply deleting Section 230 is definitely not paying attention. But if a Member of Congress truly wants to cut off their nose to spite their face, supporting the "sunsetting" proposal is a good way to do that, I guess. 1/
Reposted byAvatar Daphne Keller
Avatar
Avatar
Man does this Google Chrome ad bum me out. It offers Chrome as a tool for companies to surveil and control their employees. For starters, your Chrome browser can prevent you from pasting, printing, uploading, or downloading content. 1/
Reposted byAvatar Daphne Keller
Avatar
Avatar
This is pretty high on my list of AI things that actually scare me.
Silicon Valley tech leaders are now openly embracing Middle Eastern oil money, giving Saudi and the UAE unprecedented influence in the U.S. tech industry. “The Khashoggi era is over,” said a prominent venture capitalist. www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2...
Silicon Valley once chafed at dictatorships. Then came a Middle East gold rush.www.washingtonpost.com Virtually overnight, the Middle East has emerged as the most powerful geopolitical force in the tech industry, due in part to the Biden administration’s fears about China.