"Why does Biden look and sound fine when his campaign is shooting him on film the day after and didn't when it was the news hand of David Zaslav's company?" has its own answer if you just think about it a little bit
a simple explanation would be that they chose to keep both candidates’ mics at the same level, which would be absolutely insane in literally any other context but somehow seen as fairness in this one
Sure. I don't know, but like, it sure seems like the difference between the debate and those other two is so clearly the sound, I wasn't listening to the debate, I watched it and read it in CC, and after the first like fifteen, Biden was doing fine visually and in the text
To be clear, my position is, even with Biden sounding raspy in the debate, that he did just fine, stayed on message, landed some hits, and Trump raved like a madman for two hours and barely made sense.
mine is that people who want to treat debates like sporting events have to report on it like a sporting event, which does not end after the first period
The real problem is the media, who have now decided it is their solemn duty to destroy Biden. Destroy him the same way they did to Clinton over her Email server and how she was secretly dying of pneumonia the entire time.
Acá -casi Canadá- si hay sol, salen en ojotas con -10 grados.
Recién este último invierno logré salir con el camperón de -30 sin 8 capaz abajo, solo 3.
My lesson from the current media environment of short clips and hawt taeks on them is that Trump created an hour of easily spliced unhinged nonsense and his few concrete policy claims are profoundly unpopular, and Biden did not, and this is good, actually.
