Post

Avatar
Ok, everybody had their fun saying Biden should just disappear his political enemies because it’s allowed now. It’s a new day, and those jokes are all old now, and also they’re cynical and stupid and counterproductive. Democracy is on the ballot. Stop fucking acting like it’s already gone.
Avatar
Because if you and enough people decide it’s already gone, it is. It’s like watching Peter Pan where you, the audience, have to clap and say you believe in fairies for them to exist, except it’s real.
Avatar
My concern is this: if Roberts is willing to do this, we have to consider that he's willing to invalidate election results that support Biden. Maybe he is and maybe he isn't. But the risk is enough that I think we have to find any way to reform the court before the election.
Avatar
I would love to have the court reformed before the election. If you’ve got a mechanism to do it, I’m all ears, because I don’t see it.
Avatar
Well, SCOTUS just gave Biden the tools. EO that says: 4 new seats. Recess appointment 4 justices in. Hope that Congress is too broken to stop when they reconvene. But of course, that means not clapping for the fairy. At least for a little while.
Avatar
It’s important to note that this would both backfire electorally and also not work practically. There’s more to seating some more justices than just Biden not getting prosecuted for doing it illegally after he leaves office.
Avatar
Yeah this is the real answer: can’t be prosecuted doesn’t mean illegal acts have validity
Avatar
Right! Biden is like “there’s four new justices now” and the court is like “lol no there’s not” and every paper is like “senile Biden believes he’s a king” and the house impeaches him and probably honestly the 25th amendment is invoked.
Avatar
What Roberts and his court have done is made it very clear that there is no institution we can trust to keep our Democracy for us. All of them can fail if we vote badly. The only thing that will protect us is electing good people to office. All the offices. That's the only actual safeguard.
Avatar
That's by definition not a safeguard. Its the process that safeguards are meant to protect. Its also not at all sustainable. Which is why safeguards were thought up. Though they seems to have been poorly structured and very weak.
Avatar
What definition of safeguards are you using? Be specific. The safeguards that exist are impeachment, legislative action, guidance by his cabinet, guidance from regulatory agencies and court orders. Safeguards are not infallible or infinite. Just like seatbelts and airbags.
Avatar
To be specific to my point, the only *actual* safeguard means the only one that is guaranteed to work.
Avatar
They are remarkably similar to seatbelts and airbags... we just found out that the seatbelts are made of yarn and the airbags are just pillows full of saw dust and your response is... "just drive good" 😂. Either way, that's a shit plan and a lot of people die.
Avatar
"win every election for the rest of time" has an extremely low probability of working. it takes a very cursory understanding of elections and probability theory to understand this is a recipe for almost inevitable fascism.
Avatar
I mean, it took a lot of years and a lot of effort to weaken the safety systems. They didn't do it overnight.