Ok, everybody had their fun saying Biden should just disappear his political enemies because it’s allowed now. It’s a new day, and those jokes are all old now, and also they’re cynical and stupid and counterproductive.
Democracy is on the ballot. Stop fucking acting like it’s already gone.
Because if you and enough people decide it’s already gone, it is. It’s like watching Peter Pan where you, the audience, have to clap and say you believe in fairies for them to exist, except it’s real.
Curing cancer or developing a unified model of subatomic physics are fundamentally hard problems. Winning the presidency and both Chambers, changing Senate procedures, expanding the courts, adding state(s) and strengthening voting and civil rights is more a question of political competence and will.
Yeah, we know how to do it, we just have to fucking do it, and to do it, we have to believe that we *can* do it, and that all is not already lost (because it’s not, even now, not yet).
My concern is this: if Roberts is willing to do this, we have to consider that he's willing to invalidate election results that support Biden.
Maybe he is and maybe he isn't. But the risk is enough that I think we have to find any way to reform the court before the election.
Well, SCOTUS just gave Biden the tools.
EO that says: 4 new seats. Recess appointment 4 justices in. Hope that Congress is too broken to stop when they reconvene.
But of course, that means not clapping for the fairy. At least for a little while.
It’s important to note that this would both backfire electorally and also not work practically. There’s more to seating some more justices than just Biden not getting prosecuted for doing it illegally after he leaves office.
Right! Biden is like “there’s four new justices now” and the court is like “lol no there’s not” and every paper is like “senile Biden believes he’s a king” and the house impeaches him and probably honestly the 25th amendment is invoked.
I know we’ve been saying that SCOTUS has made presidents kings, and maybe that’s given people the wrong impression, but what SCOTUS did is immunize presidents from criminal prosecution. It hasn’t functionally expanded their powers.
That EO would just be ink on a page. None of the lower courts or states would consider those justices anything other than cosplayers. They wouldn’t get sworn in. A judge without recognized authority is just a person in a robe.
Right. What it’s done is given license to use those powers expansively and corruptly without consequence. Like Trump could direct his DoJ to conduct explicitly political witch hunts of his enemies and give preemptive blanket pardons to the department and he and they are immune for all of it now.
An executive order is direction from the President to employees of the executive branch on how to execute powers granted by Congress. They only have the force of law if an act of Congress has provided that an EO on the sinecure subject makes it so.
It’s a good thing and I’m glad she’s doing it, and as far as removing them, no it will not work, unfortunately, unless you can find ~16 republican senators who will vote to remove them.
Also the House has to approve the articles of impeachment, and it is controlled by Republicans.
There is literally nothing that can be done pre-election because of this. People will in fact have to vote harder.
I don’t think this point is being discussed enough. Everyone says we can still vote in November but what if the courts throw out a losing result and nobody stops them?
You got a phone. Call your reps. Easy action.
You got an email account. Write your reps and friends.
Lay it out.
Do at least a tiny bit more than vote?
You got something better to do? You can post on bluesky while you're sitting on the steps of your state capital.
