Post

Avatar
There’s a nigh infinite number of books to be written about the early decades of the FDA. Every claim of “The market will fix it because consumers will demand clean/safe $ITEM” only works if: 1) The market provides such a thing, despite monopolies. 2) It actually is and not marketing bullshit.
WE remember the convenience pitches, but sanitation/hygiene/health pitches were VERY common at the time: Our Brand Won't Kill You Thanks to SCOTUS we'll find out empirically, again, which brands of food will kill us.
Avatar
God we’re going to have so many people rushed to emergency rooms in the coming decades over food & product safety levels dropping to “if we get sued then we change”
Avatar
Avatar
Worse, you'll get the products that won't kill you right away, but have enough horrible things that they give you cancer in ten years...
Avatar
*makes notes to start teaching home cooking, gardening, and canning classes. Advertising line: Less likely to kill you than storebought!"*
Avatar
But just think of the boom in the mortuary sector of the economy! /s
Avatar
I tell you what, sitting in the UK where the rivers run w/sewage, schools and hospitals collapse, and apartment buildings burn down bc of lack of regulation made it even harder to read the ruling. bc it'll be us now, having tossed one of the quiet wonders of the world, US regulatory agencies : (
Avatar
What we’ve been seeing lately with raw milk, despite the threat of H5N1 infection in it in *addition* to all the other nasties it can carry, suggests that an alarming fraction of consumers will not, in fact, demand it.
Well, those that do won't demand it for long.
Avatar
Reading Upton Sinclair's "The jungle" was pretty enlightening for me... 🤢
Avatar
An awful lot of vegetarians were made that way.
Avatar
I seem to recall hearing that he was very upset - he wanted everyone to be upset about the conditions of the *workers*, not the food...
Avatar
3) The link between vector and harm is obvious enough to identify.
Avatar
30 years later "but seriously, now Brand X new formulation won't kill you we promise"
Avatar
Avatar
Oh, a building that was half occupied by the paint stripper maker, and half by a dry cleaners. ...........
Avatar
Yes—and consumers can’t verify that something’s *actually* clean/safe/pure. I can’t test the spices for lead or confirm that my multivitamins do contain everything the label says. I can only detect problems after I‘ve been harmed (and still might not know which product was at fault)
Avatar
God this shit is nightmarish for folks like me who have unusual food/chemical allergies. I already struggle when a brand randomly changes how they make something, or stops making an item that I can use. Hell, half the reason I can't have Citric Acid is modern CA is made from MOLD and not disclosed!
Avatar
Worse, the combination of effectively eliminating the statute of limitations on suits over regulation means you are going to get a whole bunch of "new" corporate entities suing. Who wants to start making Thalidomide?
Avatar
Avatar
Indeed, the Chinese tainted baby formula scandal was only a few years ago, and the 'market solution' was foreign imports (hence a shortage in the US)
Avatar
There was a 1950s-1960s vintage book on this for kids that I had… probably somewhere in my parents’ house decades later… but I’d like to find a copy again.
Avatar
Avatar
Also, 3) if consumers have accurate information (complete information about products, no distortion from antivax propaganda, etc) And 4) if there's no severe trade-offs to the preferable products like price or accessibility
Avatar
It seems very few people are aware that nearly all regulations exist in response to things that actually happened, not speculation of things that could happen...