Here's the full page, all this confusion really does live on just a single page that was apparently missed by the publisher. This is on an imprint of Simon & Schuster; we deserve better, as readers.
This academic pitching a fit that her book on "hanging out" wasn't cited in an article about hanging out reminds me of the time I gave a paper at a conference and a prominent scholar asked me why I didn't cite their work. My reply of "I didn't find it relevant" sent a chill through the room.
I feel like too many people were able to see JFK right before he died. That was the problem, actually: it was too easy to see the president from a book depository or a grassy knoll