Kevin, любитель кави 💙💛: What precisely is the position? Removing age minimum would indicate there is no minimum, that's the plain English meaning. How would that be bad? (I am trans btw, not some rando dude in your mentions) And Levine is herself transgender, so this makes even less sense.

This is the sound of the Biden administration throwing the trans community under the bus on the anniversary of Stonewall.

I've seen other people saying the NYT made this up or something? I don't know what to make of it until I see it coming from the administration directly

It's 100% real and the position of the administration. I've checked with sources in the know.

What precisely is the position? Removing age minimum would indicate there is no minimum, that's the plain English meaning. How would that be bad? (I am trans btw, not some rando dude in your mentions) And Levine is herself transgender, so this makes even less sense.

To me, a cis person, this reads like "our position is that we agree with republicans again" but I know that nuance is supposed to make it sound different than that.

Again, I don't understand how *removing* age minimums = no surgery for kids. I hope the admin issues a very clear statement because I don't trust the NYT on trans issues at all. And what would be Biden's motivation to do this while simultaneously taking TN to court over TN's ban on minor care?

Post