L O L G O P: I don't know how you lose running against a Court that wants to prosecute the pregnant and preemptively pardon that perpetrator.

I don't know how you lose running against a Court that wants to prosecute the pregnant and preemptively pardon that perpetrator.

30% of people still hellbent on the notion that the leopards will never ever eat their faces

or they're hungry

could a female president* get an abortion in a no-abortion state if she deems it critical to her ability to do the job and therefore "official"? *i know i know bear with me here

only if she's republican!

Ooooooo. Good Question. I say, yes, she can get an abortion because "She is Queen." (We know the Reich will never elect a woman for this reason, anyway.) They must be crushed.

Glad it's a bear with you and not a man because a bear won't yell at you for that question

well what if the BEAR needs an ab... never mind

The beauty is that it works all the way down ticket. Just keep hammering that Republicans enabled this and are cheering it.

According to SCOTUS, you can pay the president $10 million for a pardon and the president cannot be prosecuted for corruption because its a core power of his office. OR You can get a pardon THEN pay the president $10 million and you can't prosecute because its not corruption.

I dissent

By throwing up your hands and pretending you're powerless, even though you've just been granted near-infinite power

I wonder how many of that 30% are NOT Trump/MAGA voters.

Dems will sprint after that 30% to snatch defeat out of the mouth of victory. Then blame leftists for not comprising enough

and what will you do

Vote for the party that will probably do nothing, but nothing is better than fascism I guess? Look we get it already. "vote blue" *waves little blue flag*

Thank you for posting this.

That 30% is a reminder that minority rule has historically been a thing.

People have forgotten that SCOTUS had protected Trump in the emoluments decision of 2021. Kind of forewarning the Immunity one. www.cnn.com/2021/01/25/p...

Supreme Court dismisses emoluments cases against Trump | CNN Politicswww.cnn.com The Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a case concerning whether former President Donald Trump violated provisions of the Constitution that bar a president from profiting from a foreign governme...

We are currently losing

Meanwhile The Other Opposing Force Are Waiting in they 🌏 Stately Made Condo 🤵🏽‍♂️ other in a bunker 🦹🏻‍♂️

Post