"Fasten your seatbelts," says the New York Times when asked how they would cover a second Trump presidency, like people say before starting an exciting theme park ride
I'm no ivy league fail upward brunchlord news professional, but I feel it's generous to call conspiratorial fascism (managed by a sociopathic manbaby with a fourth grade reading level) "disruptive"
that's kind of like saying nuclear annihilation is "modifying"
Relevant reference. Though I got the sense Moonves was thinking almost entirely about profits, and the New York Times team is currently thinking not just profits, but personal excitement as well.
