In his presidential immunity opinion, Chief Justice Roberts accused Justice Sotomayor and the two other Democratic-appointed justices who joined her in dissent, of “fearmongering on the basis of extreme hypotheticals.”
He's wrong. Let me explain. https://t.co/q7LEVH6z0m
Roberts declined to meet on SCOTUS's 'Code of Ethics' because of, he says, "separation of powers." How can cops police themselves? SCOTUS hold itself accountable? THAT is where real separation of powers comes in... where the CHECKS and BALANCES are not corruptible by the entity with power.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 How did all that “fearmongering” we were accused of during the Senate confirmation hearings for the 4 associate justices that committed perjury turn out for us, re Dobs?
“Extreme hypotheticals” like, say, the very case that was brought before the SCOTUS that prompted this decision? Or any of the other “extreme hypotheticals” that Trump is merrily saying out loud, on the record, that he will do? That he tried to do while president last time?
