Post

Avatar
this is a variant of the core delusion of the catholic convert, which is that they have discovered something uniquely beautiful that other foolish people have supposedly rushed to abandon
The thing is that Elizabeth Bruenig, for all that she styled herself as “on the left,” she has always viewed Democrats as irredeemably evil and Trump fans as good, decent folk who were tragically misled (but only a little bit).
Avatar
Wait wait omg is she a fucking convert?
Avatar
This makes so much gd sense
Avatar
Many of the vocal Catholics on the news are concerts. Protestantism became gauche so they converted and made it everyone else's problem
Avatar
I'm sorry, protestantism is *more gauche* than catholicism? in which universe?
Avatar
I think evangelicalism of the DFW suburb megachurch type is generally seen as pretty tacky, whereas Catholicism can attract people who want to be a part of something they see as historical and intellectually rigorous.
Avatar
STOP doing converts Want to experience catholicism anyways? We had a term for that its called WARHAMMER 40K Hi i would like one american antipope to return latin mass -phrases dreamed up by the utterly deranged *posts photo of pope feeding trans women* this is REAL catholicism done by REAL CATHOL
Avatar
I mean you say that, but let's be real here, Frank's own wild swinging between reactionary and comparably progressive stances is still not an acceptable standard for most normal, well-adjusted people.
Avatar
I'm really tired of him because the fig leaf of his occasional not treating the gays as bad as JP2 has become an excuse for people to underexamine how he is /the leftest Pope we will ever ever ever get/ and that's bad actually
Avatar
I honestly think Christianity in general is hurtling towards a cliff edge of long-term continuity among the non-insane because none of its denominations have convincingly answered "why should I believe this" without saying "because infidels go to hell"
Avatar
Modern, liberal thinkers in the Christianity today for obvious reasons don't want to say the latter but at core the driving founding impulse of Christianity was fear of death and the promise of eternal life /for those who follow Jesus and no one else/
Avatar
If that motivation to be Christian is gone, people will ask "well why should I be Christian," and if the answer is "shrug," then only the ones who do believe that infidels will go to hell will remain
Avatar
The progressive turn in the Church of Norway has saved it from a steeper decline in membership, baptisms, weddings etc., but Sunday attendance is still plummeting, even as decreased state funding is making the church more dependent on devout parishioners willing to spend their time and money.
Avatar
The reactionaries always respond by saying "Oh, so should we just constantly shift behind whatever issue is popular and fashionable in that day?" and frankly the answer is "Yeah, pretty much, unless you want to keep declining"
Avatar
Imo community is going to be a big part of its appeal in the us i think
Avatar
It works for specific cultural communities ("I go to this church because my family do") but not really as an underlying logic for a Universal, Catholic and Orthodox church
Avatar
Yeah, Catholicism is particularly bad at this. Protestant churches are, by nature of their structure, pretty adaptable. Somewhat unintentionally (because of the countless splits and overlapping diaspora jurisdictions), so are some Orthodox churches. But the Catholic Church is just so cumbersome.
Avatar
There really is like zero places for a general "i believe in this place and its people, lets celebrate and maintain it"
Avatar
I mean, that's basically what has kept me an Episcopalian. Haha.
Avatar
I mean, the demographic numbers don't lie — churches are bleeding massively, people stopping regular church attendance is way more significant a change than say immigration
Avatar
The most compelling answer to this question I've seen some of the mainline churches do is "you don't have to literally BELIEVE believe in this" and then also provide something more or less substantial to fulfill the spiritual and social needs some people have not been able to satisfy
Avatar
I think if a progressive mainline church did that but also did some of the ecstatic ritual stuff the freakiest evangelical denominations do, they'd have the winning formula for drawing standoffish people like me through the doors
Avatar
Well, not even that. He's not moved a single jot or tittle on doctrine, he's merely said he does not think the Church has, y'know, the powers of the state to *enforce* laws against sinfulness
Avatar
I mean idk if you want ot call it doctrine but i think the power restructuring and empowering congregations to have more say in church politics is a big shift hes overseeing
Avatar
Yeah that's a big shift in politics that _may_ hold the RCC together and may make it go the way of the Anglican Communion :/
Avatar
having lunch with them sure didn't translate into not backstabbing them though