Their goal is to stir and track drama and narrative. It doesn’t matter in the slightest if one party tries to govern and the other tries to destroy things
No their owners and editors actively want to punish Biden because he's refused to genuflect and grant them a sit down interview.
Also likely the factor that Trump in office is better for subscriber numbers
Subscribers will go down, & I think they even know that on a conscious level
I think it's a combination of compulsion & policies
It's like me & mixed nuts. I will finish the nuts tonight. I just can't help it, & neither can they. So I have policies about where I put the tin & when I can eat them
Maggie doesn't have 1% of the clout needed to make any of this happen. This is Art sulzberger reacting to rejection like a deranged incel stalker bent on revenge
What good are subscriber numbers when all the reporters get arrested?
I mean, I suppose the owners don't care about becoming mindless state news or something?
can't wait for their "former president donald j. trump, previously convicted of 34 felonies, did not appear to commit any others during his recent rally in siegheil, idaho"
Seriously? NYTimes just had to get Biden's debate stumble into Biden's comments on the Supreme Court's ruling? That was more important than the peril to our democracy?1
You know, Biden could just cancel the election because presidents have absolute immunity for official acts now. Just declare it an official act, throw Trump and Guantánamo Bay, arrest the Supreme Court, and cancel the election. If MAGA wants a dictatorship, let’s fucking give them one.
Absolute trash
Maybe a (dumb) optimistic take is that the NYT, realizing Biden isn’t stepping down, is trying to slowly walk back their stuff by saying he’s doing better at speaking
