Wendell B: I thought she concurred in part? In all but III-C?

I appeared on Gray TV today to discuss the Supreme Court's ruling today in favor of Donald Trump on immunity and the likely impact of that decision on each of the four pending prosecutions of Former President Trump. www.graydc.com/2024/07/01/s...

Supreme Court immunity ruling set to delay Trump’s criminal trialswww.graydc.com The conservative justices’ opinion that Trump is at least partially immune for what he did in office upends the timeline for his four criminal cases.

What about a superseding indictment in DC, meticulously following the Barrett, J. footnote?

Justice Barrett's footnote is part of a dissent, not a majority opinion.

I thought she concurred in part? In all but III-C?

Can Trump’s lawyers make the signing of the checks to Cohen an “official act?”

Post