i wonder if they're bringing up stuff he did in the white house so now they can try to get the case halted and tossed on the "official act' immunity the gang of six just made up yesterday
Their argument is that the prosecution partially relied on things he did while president as evidence, and that might now be inadmissible due to Trump v. U.S.
Right, the court said that communication between Trump and another executive branch official constituted an official act, and it could not be used as evidence in a prosecution *even for an unofficial act.*
