So that whole bowling alone fixation when I was in grad school inspired this piece in gender & society. Would have loved to have added that little tidbit 20 years ago (I can’t believe I’m that old)
Maybe we're just not reckoning with a reality that is extraordinarily dark. Huge numbers of Americans are not that worried about what Trump will do--either because they don't understand it, don't care, or want what he's offering.
I worry about the disconnect from elites and the actual polling we're seeing in recent days. I'm not sure they're wrong, but the polling is not overwhelming in providing a clear narrative. What if it's a tight race regardless of which democrat? projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/
This is extraordinarily risky. The longer and more divisive a primary, the harder it is to recover for the general. These folks (podcast guys), in practice, had their careers made b/c of the Trump presidency. They just don't have as much to lose.
Representative Marie Gluesenkamp Perez really nails how government policy (even those focused on equity) embeds inequality with administrative burden, or "an approach to governance that produces alienating policy." www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/m...
Though many states still allow abortions for 'medical emergencies', burdens (e.g. confusing statutes) mean almost no one gets them--parallel to the TRAP laws prior to Dobbs that limited access to abortion when it was legal. A point we make in our piece on "gendered burdens". osf.io/preprints/so...
The end of Roe, and the growing fixation on 'marriage', finally pushed me to write about gendered burdens. Gendered burdens are not simply about preventing access to rights and benefits, they are the means by which the state controls women's bodies, labor, and identity.
New from @pamherd.bsky.social & I: the aftermath of Dobbs shows how gendered administrative burdens are the means by which by which the state reinforces a white Christian nationalist vision open.substack.com/pub/donmoyni...
Card ultimately stopped doing research on the minimum wage because the backlash from w/in the discipline was so intense. Yes, it's empirical. But strident ideology can play out in lots of ways. www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2006...
Like Card and Krueger basically started the "hey, maybe supply and demand under perfect competition is not the best way to think about existing labor markets" backlash and they did it with empirical studies.
“As I was laying there, I was just thinking to myself, ‘I can do it.'"
This Rutgers PhD student delivered her dissertation hours after giving birth. cnn.it/4awCwKl
This was a self-inflicted crisis. Michigan -and plenty of other places with protests- held graduation like they always do. Protests at commencements are normal. Guiliani was my PhD grad speaker and people protested--at the ceremony too! We all survived (and the protesters were proved right!).
Michigan managed to hold graduation (and haven't been arresting students) despite similar levels of conflict. And there were some protests, but similar to protests I've witnessed at other graduations, it was fine. This is how you *actually* do free speech.
To clarify, they cited used a just enacted policy regarding demonstrations to go after students for demonstrating. It looks like this was the earlier suspension of Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine.