idk it just seems to me that laws, like tech, should be created with the question "what would the worst person i know be able to do with this power" in mind and it's truly incredible how much this opinion fails at that basic task
John Roberts must be the most neurotypical person in existence because the immunity ruling reads like someone who has never had a single “but what if…???” anxiety spiral in his life
They don't even need to imagine!
The individual literally named in the case is one of the worst people on the planet. He's got a track record of doing or attempting some of the worst shit imaginable. This isn't some distant hypothetical!
It tells who these judges are that they looked at Donald J. Trump, maybe the worst human being ever to hold high office in the US (not the one who has done the most harm or evil, just the worst human) and said, this is the leader who must act without consequence, and this is good.
