Post

Avatar
I dunno what's going to happen or what should happen but my feeling is that if you swap candidates in July you get annihilated in November
Avatar
On the other hand, the Heritage Foundation has been kind enough to publish their plans for the fourth reich and I think people will be eager to vote against that
Avatar
News about Thomas Eagleton's prior treatment for depression (which included electroshock therapy) dropped in July, he withdrew August 1, and in November McGovern won only Massachusetts - far and away the worst defeat in Democratic party history
Avatar
Obviously the McGovern campaign was its own thing but I think it should be considered that panicking and switching the candidate at the top of the ticket is a vote of no confidence that everyone will hear
Avatar
Yeap. But the party seems in open revolt. This is also of Biden's doing, as he considered only going for one term, but backed off the decision. This outcome is also why I opposed Biden's nomination, aside from my support for Warren and then Sanders when she abandoned universal healthcare.
Avatar
Everyone who thought he was a good choice as Obama's VP deserves blame for this because the VP is always a presumptive future candidate and party leader, which is why you shouldn't pick someone who''s going to be in their 70s after two terms as VP.
Avatar
I loathed him because of his advocacy of the Iraq invasion and his noxious role in reducing bankruptcy protections (he was a credit card industry shill, and even got Hunter a job with one of the companies he supported). I never liked him, although I agree with Ian that replacing him now is not ideal
Avatar
Same, same. I'm old enough I remember him having to drop out of the 1988 campaign because he was appropriating Neil Kinnock's family history (among other things). I remember the plan to partition northern Iraq. Almost all the people baying for a new candidate make me think that's a really bad idea.
Avatar
(👋Delaware native) I think it goes back far longer than him being named as VP. He's felt like he deserved/was owed the presidency for years and years.
Avatar
He is far from the only person who felt they were overlooked or screwed over (e.g. McGovern had a pretty good case where people like Carter pissed on his anti-war candidacy because they'd supported the Vietnam War). Biden didn't appoint himself VP. People who did needed to be looking forward.
Avatar
I'm old enough to remember that part of the calculus behind Biden's VP nod was he was too old to run for president in 2016, and could therefore be relied on not to undermine Obama while Obama was still in office.
Avatar
Don’t know if that’s true, but whoever thought that was apparently incorrect because he probably would have run in 2016 if his son hadn’t died. Perhaps they should have chosen someone younger who they trusted.
Avatar
I guess they trusted that 74 was too old to run for what could be an 8 year term. Given where we are now, that judgement was entirely correct.
Avatar
Rich donors and a couple backbenchers freaking out is not The Party In Revolt
Avatar
Front page WashPo right now, Warner is trying to shiv him
Avatar
Something like this boosts WaPo readership. Warner is an opportunist. I don’t think you have refuted the claim.
Avatar
There were 2 unsourced articles (NYT and Politico) before he announced his candidacy.
Avatar
WaPo, the NYT, and CNN want you to believe the party is in open revolt. It’s good for their bottom line.
Avatar
A handful of rich people and leftists who mostly weren't going to vote for him to begin with are big mad, and that's enough to keep the media spinning, especially when the rich people are calling them to whine. You'd think it would give them pause that party donors are calling them, but...