They're still half a step behind the New York Post, which stealth-edited a claim that the shooter was Chinese *and* railed against other outlets for not immediately jumping to conclusions
Terrifying journalistic bullshit from @nypost, which posted an article claiming that the shooter was a “Chinese man” (thanks @paulayoo for grabbing), then replaced it with a version that the shooter was “identified only as a white male” shortly thereafter — WITHOUT flagging the correction.
Might have been a bad run? Currently shows all three polling figures R+1.9, fundamentals D+3.5, full forecast D+2.2.
538 definitely has some screwy results though--this was one of the simulated outcomes they published two days ago.
Also, it's flat out dishonest to stop your graphs in the late 90s. England banned handguns entirely in 1997. Since guns prevent crime, violent crime must have immediately skyrocketed, right?
...oh.
