Post

Avatar
reflecting on the immunity decision a bit, what the Court seems to be saying is that every element of the executive branch is at the President’s disposal, no matter what he wants to use it for. his motives don’t matter. the office is a weapon to be wielded however he sees fit.
Avatar
Everything short of regulating emissions
Avatar
I know this is tongue in cheek, but the point is that the limitation is the scope of the office as the Court sees it. within that scope, it’s open season. so under the majority’s logic, for example, there’s really no limit to what the president could use the military for.
Avatar
right. the president could order troops to suppress protesters using live fire and the supreme court would extend that absolute immunity
Avatar
A Republican president could. I have a feeling that what the supreme court will count as an official act is extremely president-dependent.
Avatar
How are they going to issue certiorari without hands or throats