Post

Avatar
what’s really going to be wild is if we ditch a sitting president for the second time in history based on a fullbore media and social media freakout and then everyone goes back to claiming media narratives don’t matter in politics
Avatar
Here's what I think: I think that if he's still perfectly sharp and everyone around him knows it, he'll be fine. If there's an actual cognitive decline issue, which I do not for a moment pretend to know if there actually is, he's doneso.
Avatar
That’s where I am. There’s really no halfway point.
Avatar
I'm not so sanguine that "true, objective reality" will win out. The AG Failson has his frame and he's been busy shoving every little scrap of evidence at hand into it. The big "Biden Lapses" article has text that mostly contradicts its headline. Doesn't matter to the freakout.
Avatar
It's not abt true objective reality, it's just that I think he will be able to successfully resist pressure to step down if everyone around him knows this us bullshit, but not if they know it's not.
Avatar
I think the news is crafting its own reality now though. Everyone around him is hyper-sensitive to little lapses because they know how they'll be seized. I think a lot of the debate was that he knew how important it was to nail that and the pressure ended up giving him the twisties.
Avatar
Right. Jill‘s, “Joe, it’s time” conversation only happens if there’s something there.
Avatar
I'm not sure the converse is true though. There could be something there that people close to him are in denial about.
Avatar
As someone who has been caregiver to cognitively impaired folks. No. One knows.
Avatar
(sorry, to clarify you mean that people can tell, or that people can't tell? genuinely asking, confused by punctuation lol)
Avatar
The appalling Dianne Feinstein debacle weighs on my mind. bsky.app/profile/russ...
I keep thinking about how millions of Californians were represented by Dianne Feinstein even as her memory deteriorated. It only ended when she died. Awful.
Avatar
It should, but as someone who was watching Feinstein in business meetings during that, the comparison with Biden right now isn’t even close. Feinstein needed people to turn the page of her binder for her.
Avatar
But the real question is if that’s where Biden would be two years into a second term, and voters have a right to ask that question.
Avatar
I agree Biden is much more capable than Feinstein was. But Feinstein is a disturbing example of how Dems handle (or fail to handle) a genuinely unfit officeholder.
Avatar
On the other hand, it's an example of voters electing an octogenarian despite her being genuinely too old to serve out her term. So perhaps reason for optimism for Biden, however grim it might be.
Avatar
The trouble is he's obviously deteriorated significantly in the last few years, and there's no way to know how bad it will be even a year from now. He shouldn't have been running in this election at all.
Avatar
It's not obvious to me? "detoriate" implies he always hasn't been like this. This is from a 2019 story.
Avatar
Genuinely confused how anyone is still prefacing his status with conditionals after what we saw last week. Look I’m as despondent about all this as anyone, but how is there still debate about Biden’s cognitive decline? What is there to debate or confirm?
Avatar
He's never been amazing in debates, and his answers were more coherent in the transcript than they seemed live. I'd buy the story of an off night, I'm not close enough to know for sure.
Avatar
Look, I hate it. I deeply, profoundly hate it given the circumstances, but we saw what we saw. That wasn’t “an off night.” The sooner everyone stops telling themselves this will go back in the box the sooner we can figure out what has to be done.
Avatar
Hey, I'm just an observer. No one's consulting me on this one, I promise you that.