these basic facts about every online platform out there are also the explanation for "but everyone on my timeline hates this change, why did the site do it". No matter who is on your timeline, they are massive outliers just by dint of posting enough to be on your timeline.
Fun fact: the median bluesky user has made 7 posts, and is followed by one person.
The mean number of posts per user is 96.
Only 323,532 out of 5,950,015 users have posted more than 10o times.
bsky.jazco.dev/stats
I have posted more on bluesky in 8 months than my 10 years on the bad place. And the posts sometimes spur really cool conversations, which never happened there. Not all the time, which is also fine, because sometimes you just want to comment to acknowledge or appreciate the original post
I suspect part of it is that it used to be quite common to see advice to newcomers to upload an avatar, put something in their bio, and make an initial post before starting to follow people to avoid getting blocked as a potential bot.
Are posting and replies / comments counted differently? I haven’t posted anything here yet… should really fix that, maybe… but do drop replies in somewhat often.
remember that map of Bluesky clusters
I was in the Squid Cluster for reasons that are totally opaque to me, but apparently I follow cephalopod scientists
Yup, seeing those stats was eye-opening finding out I was consistently right around the 99.5% percentile for posts. I used to think I was a 'filthy casual' and no... I'm an upper echelon power user it turns out. O.o
…..the heck now? I mean. I am fairly antisocial and introverted IRL, BUT WHY HAVE A SOCIAL MEDIA IF YOU ARE NOT GOING TO SOCIAL??
is that largely fakes/bots??
To follow interesting posts and discussions. A lot of people treat social media sort of like old talk radio. You spend most of your time listening, but occasionally call in to leave a comment
My brain finds it difficult to participate intensely in more than one social media platform at at time. When Bluesky began taking off, I began badly neglecting Mastodon. I'm on a number of Discords but only skim. It's easiest if I parcel out *types* of interactions to different platforms.
Now that you say that, I think I’m similar. I don’t like feeling like I have to be present and interactive in 15 different places. I like having one, maybe two places I can hang out and talk more.
This is so weird to me, a terminally online person. I don’t even post that much compared to the real Poasters! I believe you, but it doesn’t *seem* like it could possibly be right.
There's an interesting article in Nature from 2001 "Friends are stranger than strangers: if your friends were normal people they would not know you" around this except applied to 'real life'.
The Nature site has the name of the openly available pre-print and Sci-Hub exists..
Ok but everyone on my timeline are the people using the site. The people who bounced… bounced!
The question is how do you get more people and I guess if you have me, why bother, I’m here already.
You could probably get a significant chunk by checking to see if they've "liked" anything recently but you'd still probably mislabel some lurkers that way
There are a LOT of people using the site who never actually post anything at all, just follow people and read stuff
Baffling to me, but far more normal than us edge cases
Outrage culture strongly encourages LURK MOAR LEST THOU ART PERCEIVED AND CANCELLED.
As an example: I got called a qualitatively Bad Person a few years ago due to my choice of how to euthanize a struggling fish in a failing aquarium.