Dr. Samantha Hancox-Li: john roberts, clarence thomas, samuel alito, brett kavanaugh, neil gorsuch, and amy coney barrett must be impeached and replaced

fundamentally being in the majority on Trump v US is immediately disqualifying for a supreme court justice. it declares yourself in opposition to the foundations of the American project of democracy and limited government. all six of them must be impeached and replaced.

john roberts, clarence thomas, samuel alito, brett kavanaugh, neil gorsuch, and amy coney barrett must be impeached and replaced

So far AOC has the right idea. Getting enough Senate votes is another matter. bsky.app/profile/greg...

You could also call up your US rep and demand they join AOC in this move for impeachment. Can't pass the R House, but they HAVE to use their bully pulpit and rally the public. www.nydailynews.com/2024/07/01/a...

AOC calls for impeachment of ‘corrupt’ Supreme Court after Trump immunity rulingwww.nydailynews.com Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Monday said she would push to impeach what she called “corrupt” Supreme Court justices after they granted substantial immunity to former President Trump. T…

To be delicate, by declaring a Presidential Purge, those six have eliminated any obligation to go through the formal process of impeachment.

Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law? More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?

Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that! More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?

Republicans do not understand the power they're playing with they imagine that there's going to be a total constitutional rupture that leaves them in charge and then after they'll add a "no take backs" clause to the constitution what we libs are waking up to is: two can play this game.

sulla comes to mind. once you march on Rome once putting in a law that says "no marching on Rome" isn't going to be enough

One can only hope. In a way I don't understand why Biden still haven't made a warning shot in the air for the right-wing crowd, just to give them the idea. Do something obviously NEW, then give a press-conference and say: your candidate just enable that. Do you like it? Not for him, but in general?

There were lots of juicy takes the first day, like, drone-strike this, or torture that, but I'm sure one can find something that is simultaneously not unethical, previously impossible (illegal?), but also not-social-collapse-inducing. Literally a warning shot. And publicly name Trump as enabler...

Yeah. And like: that snide "faithful execution" remark Roberts put in there implicitly acknowledges legal interpretive powers for the president. So: why would the autocrat they're hoping for really even need to keep them around?

yup.

Post