This is amazing. The judge holds attorney in criminal contempt to force him to reveal what the attorney asserts is privileged information. Immediately the judge faces pushback on the law on this, calls for a 5 minute recess to “think about it”, and has now been off the bench for 40 minutes.
Over at the Young Thug trial, Brian Steel discovered that Judge Glanville and ADA Adrian Love met in his chambers with a witness ex parte to get him to change his mind from pleading the 5th.
Judge Glanville has threatened to jail the attorney if he does not reveal how he found out.
For lay people, an ex parte meeting is between the Court (the judge) and only one of the parties without the other party present. With some exceptions, they are generally a big no no for obvious reasons. So this judge and the prosecutor met with a witness alone to try and convince them to testify.
When defense counsel found out about this and objected, the judge then ordered defense counsel to tell him who informed defense counsel of the meeting. When defense counsel (rightly in my opinion) refused on ethical grounds, the judge held him in contempt of court and ordered him jailed until he did
I have been threatened with contempt before for refusing to divulge information, but generally the court backs off the moment a lawyer says “Your honor, I cannot answer that without breaching privilege so…I mean…let me call home and tell them I won’t be there for dinner I guess?”
It’s better when you watch two other attorneys jump up and say “Your honor, you can’t just order him jailed, you have to recuse yourself for and give him a due process hearing before another judge before he’s jailed, here’s the case law, also you’re wrong and this should be civil contempt at most.”
And also, what the actual fuck. You had an ex parte meeting without me, hid that you had it and are now trying to strong arm me to give up who told me you were breaking judicial ethics, the constitution of state of georgia and all rational common sense. Respectfully, GFY. Respectfully.
Yowzah! I got a feeling this judge may be entering into a world of increased scrutiny... and questions about if this may not have been the first time they conspired with the prosecution.
Not just /this/ defense attorney, but several other defense attorneys from other trials in front of this judge, are suddenly scrambling to file disclosure motions based on today's events. The Devil's going down to Georgia indeed.
“A figure from Stone Mountain came to me in a dream and whispered about the meeting.“
Does it matter who told the lawyer that the judge and prosecutors were conspiring to violate their client’s constitutional rights…or?
I cannot imagine how frantically his law clerks are searching Westlaw and Lexis for some precedent from 1882 or something that supports the judge’s position.
Judge: I have suddenly been called away on an urgent legal matter in the hinterlands of Alaska. Wait, that's not far enough. Antarctica! Antarctica, that will do.
Judge and prosecution in-cahoots with having an ex parte meeting should get the case tossed no problem should a conviction occur.
As it is a mistrial is exactly what should be declared, and both the judge and prosecutor be bought up on ethics charges in front of the bar.