Post
dave. dave. this is way too much information to put in public. i could figure this out in like half an hour
“here’s his full legal name and address that I couldn’t fit in the previous post”
Come on, he's not that bad, he'll leave out the first number
He'll post his credit card number and the 3 digit code on back in separate posts so people won't connect the two
He'll blur it out so you can't read it.
It's all good.
"and known associates, should he seek privacy there"
The Washington Post is outing Trump jurors??
Yeah i have IDed one of my neighbors without any effort. Terrifying.
they exist to generate clicks
if they out a juror they get all the clicks from 1. the outing 2. the mistrial 3. the rescheduled trial
ad infinitum
"He has two children, both of whom are especially afraid of spiders,"
And here’s his route to work and schedule.
He might as well post the kids' names and the times they travel to and from school each day
Fox News tonight, probably
Give LibsofTikTok a couple of hours
I think I already know who it is
My fiancee is friends with one of his coworkers. Not cool.
He better not be seated on the jury. Maybe that will save him and the store
I read that no one was selected today
Ugh. Well they need to excuse him and publicize the fact that nobody from that store is on the jury. Dummies
Me too, I've fairly confidently identified my neighbor here. Sigh.
I mean I'm a theatre person so
JFC. Is the media *trying* to dox the jurors?
Their murders will give pundits something to condemn in the strongest possible terms, after bemoaning the "partisanship" and "lack of civility" that led to said murders.
Gah! How'd I forget that part?
Our minds shy away from holding his entire character in the mind’s eye at once, lest the abyss gaze back
This isn't "trying," he just doxxed someone in a case that has already riled up far right terrorists.
that's how to get jurors disqualified to save the number of dq's you have, doncha know?
there should be sanctions for this bullshit
If he did it to this one, that info is getting out there for plenty.
Posting copies of their drivers license would barely be much worse
It does appear that the Post has edited the article to be a LITTLE bit more vague, but not enough.
Also even if they dont identify a specific person that just means everyone that vaguely matches is in danger, its not much better!
"We're lookin' fer somebody what reads books! Gittem, boys!"
This is pretty darn specific! That bookstore is not that large & probably exactly one person has worked there 23 years.
there is zero chance Trump's team is letting this guy sit, tbf
Yeah but Dave is reporting everybody like this. Somebody's gotta stop his dumb ass
It’s strange. I *know* that people in the US have much more extensive rights to free speech, but it’s still a hell of a trip to see someone doing something that carries a two to five year prison sentence in England and Wales.
If that were a trial in England and Wales, you could get done for contempt of court for tweeting that lede!!
Still, it's a nice change of pace because usually I'm all 'yes. It's terrible. We have very sharply limited speech rights here' to look at something and go 'yeah, that should be illegal'.
We have to assume all jurors are in danger of retribution from Trump's deranged supporters, if he's convicted. It's just like a mafia trial, in that respect. Utterly crazy.
Agree w you. (American Eyeballs much?) This is a fairly sane, responsible discussion about the jury selection process and its protocols. www.wnyc.org/story/former...
Holy cow. This came up AGAIN. They had seven jurors, then had to delete one because this: (screencap from Politico) www.politico.com/newsletters/... ?
Canada too. Most times you can’t report anything about the jury if there is one.
