This is how it appears at the top of Bing when I searched to see if it was real, because his full quote says it's "science backed" so they're just reporting that, uncritically, because journalism is dead.
I know this is just spreading distrust, but it's such a double negative anyway. If someone bad follows you, maybe (very hard maybe) that says something, but if they're secretly a massive hypocrite then that balances back out to the poster being fine.
These are cool!
I hope you don't mind comparison, but they put me in mind of someone I follow on tumblr called gatheringbones, she stitches yarn onto fabric to create saints.
gatheringbones.tumblr.com/archive/tagg...
I just like it when people take little dolls and say yeah that's a protector :)
I don't have many fashion opinions, but I cannot be convinced the Birkin is a nice bag, I'm sorry, it's kinda ugly and looks weird on anyone under 60.
This is the only good use case: fashionable grandma, but it still looks like it's made of "genuine leather" and cost £20 off the market.
Dreamt that the town Postman Pat lived in was called Gallifrey, and that came before Doctor Who, and when they named Doctor Who's planet the context was that you were supposed to laugh.
I hope you remember this when she gets even more power (you won't, people like you never do. "How could this happen????" Yeah I dunno Dave, total mystery m8)
Yep. And our media is treating it the same way, by pathologizing concern about it as a form of mental illness and suggesting that’s the “real” problem.
Back in the day when someone was lying on the internet they were at least someone. Now you get machines telling you aeroplanes had candlelight and it's not even bait.
