Elizabeth Spiers: To be more specific it’s not the Christianity they *say* they practice. Lotta people with “love thy neighbor” in their bios have happily told me to get raped because they don’t like my politics.

I think this piece wildly misunderstands the reason why white conservative Christians (Evangelicals in particular) need to pretend Trump is Christlike and why they’re so hateful toward women and minorities.

What is the point of this bizarre wishcasting www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archiv...

They believe in a bastardized version of Christianity that’s reverse engineered from their biases. It does not teach compassion but gives them permission to judge people they don’t like and punish them for deviations from conservative norms. It has never been rooted in service to others

The proposition Liz makes, which does strike me as a wishcasting, is that these people totally reform their understanding of Christianity which they have no desire to do and won’t do.

Instead they cherry pick and misinterpret Bible verses that give them permission to harm others. When they talk about freedom, they mean freedom to do harm and control others, not individual freedom to make your own choices. If they didn’t they’d view bodily autonomy, for example, as sacrosanct.

The kind of Christianity they practice is uniquely American, socially regressive, and conflates a jingoistic and shallow Patriotism with a god ordained national destiny

It’s not Christianity in any real theological sense, and the kind of compassionate Christianity Liz talks about has zero appeal for them. It would strip them of their self righteous determination to punish others for perceived sins and would require sacrifices they don’t want to make

I don't know about this... can you point to a time in history when an explicitly Christian society lived up to these ideals? Otherwise it feels like a No True Scotsman fallacy. From the outside, it looks like internecine religious disagreement 🤷🏻‍♀️

There’s never been an time when it did. That’s not an argument I’m making. I just think the white Evangelicalism movement here is better explained by American power dynamics than anything in the Bible.

Sure, but you could make that argument about any era and social context for Christianity. I'm not saying the American Christian right isn't toxic, just gently pushing back on the instinct to call it "not really Christianity." Like the Crusaders were Christians! and mass murderers and pogromists

To be more specific it’s not the Christianity they *say* they practice. Lotta people with “love thy neighbor” in their bios have happily told me to get raped because they don’t like my politics.

And as an atheist who grew up Evangelical, i think you know I don’t exactly romanticize it

As a longtime follower/reader I give you all the benefit of the doubt, and I see what you’re getting at—but FWIW I had the same reaction as Talia to “bastardized version of Christianity” and “not Christianity in any real theological sense” and I suspect many other progressive Jews would too.

I’m a Christian and I agree with you, Sean. One reason we call right-wing evangelicals “not really Christians” is, well, they started it. So as an *intra-Christian* dynamic, it’s satisfying to do it in return. But yeah, it sounds all wrong from the outside and I’ve learned to be mindful of that.

Lotta people view the ultimate act of love as keeping other people out of an eternity of hellfire, via their very specific definitions of sin. I don't think arbiting theology is a useful approach -- it's a dual edged sword for one thing!

I'm not; i don't care about the theology. I'm just pointing out the difference between what they say they believe and what they do and prioritize, and the real reasons they identify with Christianity.

There is a powerful tension between considering something entirely an in-group theological matter and when those same groups openly & publicly declare their aim to forcibly impose their views upon the public sphere. They don't do the latter quietly but openly and with justificatory rhetoric.

You're not pointing out the difference between what they say they believe and what they do and prioritize - you're pointing out the difference between what *you expect the words they say to mean* and what they mean with those words.1/

I believe that is what Talia and others are trying to get you to understand. That just because you have expectations that "actions and behaviors correspond to loving actions" doesn't mean people who *are not you* have those exact same expectations.2/2

Talia's right. The definition of Christian love to many evangelicals is telling your loved ones "the truth" no matter how harmful it is. To an evangelical, affirming their gay or trans child, for instance, is hatred. Because you're ensuring they go to Hell. And what loving parent would do that?

When you believe that your child will for sure burn forever if they transition, to you, the most logical loving action is trying to make sure they stay cis. Their professed beliefs are, thus, in no contradiction with their actions.

I know. I grew up Evangelical! That doesn't contradict my point though.

If you knew, you'd know it wasn't contradictory because, to them, you aren't their neighbor. You're an agent of Satan.

Um, I'm aware of that. That doesn't contradict my point either. In fact, I'm not sure you got my point at all.

No, I got your point. You're arguing that their version of Christianity isn't "real" or is "shallow," ignoring the long, long history of this exact kind of Christianity on the world stage. That they aren't practicing what they preach. But they literally are.

1) what @swordsjew.bsky.social is saying. 2) @www.bugbeardispatch.com has written about violent Christian love and how it is rationalized, as an act of rel practice. 3) the implication of bad or wrong Christianity umdrrmines any/all discussion of what they are doing and impacts.

Yep. For some varieties of Christianity, to be a good Christian is to be a bad person religiondispatches.org/christian-na...

Christian Nationalism is Authentically Christian — And According to a New Poll Most White Evangelicals are Supportersreligiondispatches.org When I attended K-12 evangelical Christian schools in the 1980s and 1990s, we didn’t call ourselves Christian nationalists; we just called ourselves Christians. As the pious Christians we were (compel...

Ok, but Constantine had a sword, so what if you like him?

(Sorry, packing a lot in there.)

I mean… exactly?

Jesus reportedly told his disciples to buy swords when he warned them about coming apocalyptic times. The implications were clearly violent; I’m so annoyed with people pretending the NT contains nothing but their favorite parts of the Sermon on the Mount and a few other passages

I'm going to have to question the tactical acumen of Jesus there anyway. Like if we're talking about people who are not professional soldiers, they would be better off stockpiling spears- which are easier to use and help protect the user more. Plus pole weapons help build community.

Post