Post
ready for the Socrates/Padme crossover?
You’re going down an existential path I can’t follow.
Where's Camus when we need him.
One must consider Padmé happy
This is unironically amazing
Maybe an unexamined life is not worth living. But a man's examined life can make him wish he was dead
Saul Bellow, Ravelstein.
You're internet famous now. 🏆
Just remember us little people when yer all rich and wealthy
What was that? Couldn't hear you over how many likes I'm getting.
Oh snapples! We already lost him.
You guys are cracking me up! Thanks for the needed laughs. ♡
The examined sand is still course and rough and gets everywhere
I wasn't in the least ready, yet here it is 👀
this is right up there with the greatest things I have ever seen on this site
Is it bad that I still read his name as "So-Crates" instead of "So-cra-tes"?
Ehh, a LITTLE embarrassing for a doctor, tbh. Especially a pioneer in Impossible Physics such as yourself.
A truth's converse is not at all necessarily true.
(or is it the inverse? uhhh)
unexamined life => not worth living
examined life =?> worth living
(yeah I meant its inverse. OOPS)
When you invert an if/then you also have to flip the clauses to maintain the logical rigor.
Unexamined life —> life not worth living
Therefore
Life worth living —> examined life
The conclusion would likely read:
Life examination is required but not sufficient for life worth living.
Exactly! And Padme only inverted the statement, she didn't flip it.
Socrates is so disappointed in her elementary fallacy.
No fuchsia
No fuchsia
No fuchsia for you!
Beam me up. I'm getting on board.
“Let me ask you something, Padme…”
I don't usually write directly, but the universe has drawn me to you to help you solve your problems. Let me know if you are having problems in your relationship or marriage, or if your partner just broke up with you! Here is the solution for you:
just live free and it will be worth living
It depends on your angle.
we must imagine sisyphus happy
