Post

Avatar
bluesky is largely convincing itself that as soon as he is elected, trump will start drone striking people who say mean things about him online, which i think is great because maybe canalizing into this belief will get the doomerist panic mongers on bsky to stop doomspiraling themselves for a bit
Avatar
that is definitely not what I’m saying on the record lol
Avatar
Two Satans Theory in action: 1) Making credible threats online during an (ascendent or actual) authoritarian regime is a bad idea and a legitimate concern, and 2) there is simultaneously a moral panic that everyone is going to get drone striked and blackbagged for every comment they ever made online
Avatar
Pretty much. What it mostly boils down to is that most Americans really don’t have the faintest idea what living under modern authoritarian regimes actually looks like, and how it’s often at the same time way more boring and way more scary than they’d imagined.
Avatar
What worries me is most Americans have no idea how resilient authoritarian regimes are. Way too many ppl out here fantasizing about pendulums and tipping points and revolution when they can’t even organize a food coop, much asymmetrical warfare against a surveillance state
Avatar
also to the extent they are ever fragile, that fragility often plays out in extremely arbitrary and violent ways. It fucking sucks to be in an authoritarian regime in a way most Americans (or Western Europeans) fundamentally do not, and probably cannot, comprehend
Avatar
Exactly, there’s no end to a revolution’s appetite for its children
Avatar
Avatar
It's amazing to me that people think it would be easily fixable when for most of human history authoritarian regimes were the norm.
Avatar
Also: the fascists are already heavily armed.
Avatar
Perhaps libs should consider being armed then
Most people setting up authoritarian regimes also don't realize how dependent they are on the authority. Things get weird when the autocrat dies. Every time it's either: Bloody civil war, quick but violent palace coup, or appointee walking in. The third is uncommon at first.
Basically if there's the civil war, the country kills it's own people, foreign agents can weaken it more, and everyone is worse off but with a competent leader (which we know because they won the war).
If it's palace coup then the leader isn't near as good because they haven't really been tested, but they at least can build coalitions which is helpful for a country
If it's an appointee it's generally the weakest leader and if they dodge a palace coup and civil war they'll just muddle along till they die and the next one comes.
They all devolve into the last one eventually because wars and coups are hard. Then the milktoast leader flails along until the country collapses and you get... something new, hope it's good.
Avatar
Seriously. Half of them can’t even organize a chores rotation with their housemates, and they think they’re gonna organize an entire revolution? Please. Start by gaining basic organizing skills by doing literally anything in the real world.