I'm curious for your opinion. Does Dinesh sound stupid here because he's wildly ignorant of what it would mean to have actual evidence for his claims or because he's bullshitting and this is the only kind of argument left to him?
I would describe him as having been taught at some point to talk but never being taught to think.
I have to confess I read about a third of the interview straight through but had to skim through the rest. His arguments are all extremely poor to an extent that was irritating.
Honestly, it was amazing to be a part of. He just had no good points. I came in with a plan to pin him down and it was like sweeping through Kuwait in 1991.
No, Dinesh didn't have a single point, not one. The bullshit he was trying to spread over this thing was just utterly transparent, as if the cows had all been fed invisible grass. It still smells bad but you can see right through it.
Do I have that long highlighted answer of his correct Philip, that authorities were investigating and at the same time basically not investigating (“pushing back”)?
At least with Generative AI there's SOME chance that it'll output some correct facts it read somewhere.
Dinesh D'Souza's not close to that accuracy level.
This has the feel of a statement proscribed by their General Counsel upon approval of an external third party …. Just a hunch
A third party who had them back to the wall with a wooden spike pressed to their chest
Could you provide some context? Was there a lawsuit? Who is Mr. Andrews? Why has this been published? If you don't know the answers, are you looking for them? I can't find anything beyond this actual statement with a Google search
I read the link, twice now. It's from February. I already knew about the film and that it's been discredited. But I don't see a reference to a Mr. Andrews or whether there's a lawsuit that could have led to this statement. It's fine if you're as in the dark as I am, I'd just like to know.
