During his State of the Union address, President Biden will order the U.S. military to establish a port in Gaza so more humanitarian aid can reach Palestinians.
Playing out a scenario here: the US says enough is enough and lands San Antonios full of aid on the Gazan shore. US Marines with tight rules of engagement guard the shipment to ensure it isn't looted. There is an incident and a marine enlistedis killed.
What happens next?
Folks, the United States has a lot of logistical capacity, the airdrops didn't stop the sea port plan, the sea port plan isn't what's stopping pressuring for a ceasefire, opening up land crossings, or funding UNRWA.
Same basic fallacy as comparing the federal budgeting process to household finances, I think. It wouldn't make sense for an individual to keep handing out knives to one side of a fistfight while also sticking around to bandage any stab wounds on the other side, but governments are not individuals.
Tough to coherently model an institution as a rational actor when it's closer to being a fractal of principal/agent problems that has somehow gained sentience.
Yeah I'm not totally sure how they're going to pull this off, especially since we're precommitted to no "boots on the ground" (cue marines just up to their ankles in the Mediterranean)
How do you build a pier/dock without going ashore? “We promise that the Army Corps of Engineers will temporarily step ashore but their feet will certainly remain wet”
Negotiations involving Hamas & the USA has been ongoing.
So the admin has some idea whether Hamas wants the food to come in
*for now*
But very risky, yes
Hamas does. Does every individual who is part of Hamas know this, agree, and understand what agreement looks like?
Like, leaving aside whether Hamas the entity can be trusted, I'm guessing the number of hotheads who hate America > 0
My honest answer here is that there's specific tactical considerations to this I haven't thought of because it's not my job to, and I have to assume everything I can think of has been anticipated by USN/USMC general staff. All we have is a barest snippet of news and no details.
All the other more important considerations aside, you know some Marine general staff sickos are absolutely PUMPED about the training aspect of this plan. Best day of their career possibly.
Kind of wondering why doing this by sea is better. When I suggested US trucks the objection was (maybe fairly) that Hamas will no scope a marine on video and we’ll get into a war. But how is this different?
I honestly think a lot of the benefit is bypassing Israeli border controls and the politics involved. Same with respect to Egypt at the south. Also boats move so much more tonnage.
It also leaves out the, in my opinion higher, risk that someone on the Hamas (or IJ, ISIS, etc. similar entity in Gaza) side kills a bunch of Marines. Along the lines of the suicide bomber during the withdrawal from Afghanistan, if not the Lebanon barracks bombing.