Existential Comics: The Three Little Pigs - existentialcomics.com/comic/553

The Three Little Pigs - existentialcomics.com/comic/553

I can't recall where I found this, but this little piggy fought back:

It's by @zachweinersmith.bsky.social and yeah I've seen it lol

Thanks for identifying the artist. Much appreciated!

Elon Musk once posted it until we shamed him into removing it! For the 10M views it generated I got zero-many dollars!

That is such a countable amount of dollars.

I seem to have added another 40 views to that. Just a small percentage of zero dollars I'm afraid. But, it makes me very happy which is priceless 😊

Rude

Labeled by Bluesky Moderation Service

Complicated issue, cause your domicile isn’t “private property” it’s PERSONAL property. In the anarchist utopia, you still can’t just barge into someone’s house. Or rather you can, but if you do that to my neighbor I’m going to mutual self defense you in the face.

Like, rolling into someone’s private space against their wishes, is violence.

I think the comic poorly understands both the argument it's opposing and the argument its making. Right of Conquest seems to be the argument the wolf is making. It is an a-moral argument, but a solid one.If you take something and are able to keep it. It is effectively yours.Violence all the way down

Nah but, he’s an anarchist and he’s implying violence against capitalists is only justified because of the violence inherent in the system, so that doesn’t really track. Though on the other hand, why is he blowing down the other two houses?

exactly. The only hypothesis that adequately explains all the data is Right of Conquest! Which is only a right in the literal De-facto sense.

I mean, I've never seen a defense of anarchism that couldn't be summarized as "might makes right".

Like under any political or economic system, the wolf could take the property by force and do what he wants, if no one can stop him. You could replace the libertarian pig with a pig of ANY ideology and the argument is the same.

The pigs a landlord

I mean, that’d be great if that was in the text

It's implied by his hat

I guess I think of that more as a generic capitalist hat lol

The second panel reads "first" instead of "second"

First pig was a housing speculator The second pig could not afford housing because of the pigs’ capitalist system

Well, then it isn't really the second panel then is it? The story starts all over again and we've already forgotten about the FIRST first pig.

The anarchist wolf is handsome. I would simply let him eat the pigs.

Why would a lender pay interest

two first pigs AND lenders paying interest lender pays interest to the one above them who they borrowed their shit from

Lol the UK will do anything to avoid building decent housing.

Big Good Wolf.

You just got an Instant follow my good man 🎩

Why would a lender pay interest?

That's why the wolf ate him. That pig was full of shit.

I did not think I would get such a harsh lesson of life today, but, life is full of surprises.

what is this fucking commie nonsense???

(sound of joke going over my head) i wanna fuck that werewolf

My humble opinion is that this tale should be interwoven with the boy who cried wolf.

Two "firsts"

Post